Abortion and multifetal pregnancy reduction: An ethical comparison
نویسندگان
چکیده
In recent years, multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) has increasingly been a subject of debate in Norway. The intensity this reached tentative maximum when the Legislation Department delivered their interpretative statement, Section 2 - Interpretation Abortion Act, 2016 response to request from Ministry Health (2014) that consider whether Act allows for MFPR healthy fetuses multiple pregnancies. concluded current abortion legislation [as 2016] constraints law otherwise stipulates. not subsided, and during autumn 2018 it was further intensified connection with Norwegian Christian Democratic "crossroads" policy signals Conservatives removing section 2.3c forbid MFPR. Many arguments are seemingly similar put forward general debate, an analysis ascertain what distinguishes other abortions yet be conducted. aim article is, therefore, examine there is moral distinction between fetuses. We will cover typical emerging Norway exemplify them scholarly articles literature. have dubbed most important against we identified harm argument, slippery-slope intention grief long-term psychological effects woman sorting argument. conclude these do measure up terms demonstrating morally relevant difference abortions. Our conclusion therefore — despite several discussants seem think no two. Therefore, on same conditions as allow abortions, should also Keywords: abortion, ethics, medical MFPR, selective
منابع مشابه
Multifetal pregnancy reduction: evolution of the ethical arguments.
Multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) was developed over 20 years ago to rescue higher-order multifetal pregnancies and has become a major component of improving the outcomes in infertility therapies. By definition, MFPR will always be controversial, but opinions do not follow the traditional "pro-life/pro-choice" dichotomy that has sabotaged the more generalized abortion debate. If one defines...
متن کاملMultifetal Pregnancy Reduction – First or Second Trimester
The incidence of multifetal pregnancies has increased dramatically over the past two decades, mainly because of the widespread use of ovulation induction agents and assisted reproduction techniques. These techniques have been a matter of concern since twin and higher order pregnancies have long been associated with an increased risk of maternal complications as well as a high prevalence of pren...
متن کاملMultifetal Pregnancy Reduction – First or Second Trimester
The incidence of multifetal pregnancies has increased dramatically over the past two decades, mainly because of the widespread use of ovulation induction agents and assisted reproduction techniques. These techniques have been a matter of concern since twin and higher order pregnancies have long been associated with an increased risk of maternal complications as well as a high prevalence of pren...
متن کاملMultifetal Pregnancy Reduction – First or Second Trimester
The incidence of multifetal pregnancies has increased dramatically over the past two decades, mainly because of the widespread use of ovulation induction agents and assisted reproduction techniques. These techniques have been a matter of concern since twin and higher order pregnancies have long been associated with an increased risk of maternal complications as well as a high prevalence of pren...
متن کامل4.3.5 Ethical Considerations for the Reduction of Multifetal Pregnancies
1. To increase awareness of the ethical issues associated with multifetal pregnancy reduction; 2. To highlight the potential ethical distinctions between singleton abortion and multifetal pregnancy reduction; 3. To explore whether different types of fetal reduction procedures present distinct ethical issues that require unique ethical justification, drawing attention to the utility of ethical a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1890-4009', '1890-3991']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v15i1.3980